Semantic Arts
  • Clients
    • Case Studies
    • Clients & Projects
  • Data-Centric
    • Data-Centric Explained
    • The Data Dilemma
    • Demystifying Standards
    • The Value Proposition
    • The Difference
  • Services
    • Offerings
    • Methodology
    • Partners
  • Expertise
    • Use Cases
    • Integration
    • Analysis
    • Risk Mitigation
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Publications
    • Videos
    • Community Events
  • About Us
    • About Semantic Arts
    • Our Team
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Semantic Arts SWAG
    • Contact Us
  • gist
  • Get A Quote
Select Page

How do I track down and debug errors in my ontology?

by Dave McComb | Oct 31, 2012 | The Whiteboard

I will answer this in the context of OWL ontologies where the errors are found using Hermit or Fact++ as the inference engine. I happen to use Protégé, but other ontology tools have similar functionality. There are a few cases. First, if the ontology is inconsistent,...

Are There Any Tools to Help Find Common Pitfalls in Ontologies?

by Dave McComb | Oct 29, 2012 | The Whiteboard

Yes. Check out http://oeg-lia3.dia.fi.upm.es/oops/. The authors looked through the literature and discovered 29 common pitfalls that arise when building ontologies. Code has been written to automatically find 21 of the 29 pitfalls. Try it out and give the authors...

What is the real difference between “on premise” systems and SaaS?

by Dave McComb | May 18, 2012 | The Whiteboard

They can be the same software. That isn’t the essential difference. There are many exceptions and edge cases but the central difference in moving from on premise to SaaS is that you are moving from a large capital budget item that takes a long time to approve to...

How do you handle a two phased commit in an SOA environment?

by Dave McComb | May 16, 2012 | The Whiteboard

There are four approaches (and a couple of the can be combined). The first is to implement on top of XP compliant data bases that allow the services to accept a commit to but still wait for the final confirmation. Given the heterogeneity of most environments this is...

Semantic Power Tools – Inference and Composition

by Dave McComb | May 14, 2012 | The Whiteboard

Inference is one of the ways that semantic technology simplifies information systems. Many of the manual assertions that must be made in the traditional systems can happen automatically in a semantic model. The more things you can infer, the fewer you need to assert,...

Why aren’t people achieving the benefits of SOA?

by Dave McComb | May 11, 2012 | The Whiteboard

The cynical response is to invoke the “Gartner Hype Cycle” and say it’s been overhyped. But that just begs the question: why do things get overhyped? In general the reason is that someone comes up with a new approach to solving a vexing problem. At...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Categories

  • AI-Ready Data
  • Business Case & ROI
  • Case Study
  • Data-Centric Architecture
  • Development
  • Financial Services
  • gist & Open Standards
  • Graph & Platform Strategy
  • Guest Blog
  • Knowledge Graphs & Ontologies
  • News & Community
  • Pharma & Life Sciences
  • The Whiteboard
  • White Papers

Recent Posts

  • Siemens: XSearch and Engineering Ontology
  • Shadow AI vs Shadow AI IT: The Next Enterprise Risk
  • Industry Knowledge Graph™ Case Study
  • gistBFO: An Open-Source, BFO Compatible Version of gist
  • Client 360 – A Foundational Challenge
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}